Guardian Digital Inc. >
Mailing List Archives >
Linux Kernel Mailing List Archive
Nick Piggin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 22:21 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > I still suspect the thrash token patch even with the swap token timeout
> > > at 0. Is it completely disabled at 0 or does it still do something?
> > It makes it harder to page out pages from the task holding the
> > token. I wonder if kswapd should try to steal the token away
> > from the task holding it, so in effect nobody holds the token
> > when the system isn't under a heavy swapping load.
> In that case, the first thing we need to do is disable thrash token
> completely, and retest that. We still don't know for sure that it is
> the problem.
> I don't have the code in front of me at the moment, but I'll be able
> to send a patch to do that in a couple of hours, if nobody beats me
> to it.
This should disable the thrashing control code?
--- 25/mm/rmap.c~a 2004-12-19 23:05:58.759420936 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/mm/rmap.c 2004-12-19 23:06:43.105679280 -0800
@@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ int page_referenced(struct page *page, i
int referenced = 0;
+ ignore_token = 1;
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/