Linux Kernel Mailing List Archive

From: Ulrich Drepper (drepper@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 27 2004 - 18:44:07 EST

• Next message: Yoichi Yuasa: "[PATCH 2.6.10] mtd: added NEC uPD29F064115 support"
• Previous message: Michael S. Tsirkin: "Re: [2.6 patch] add missing dependencies on MTD_PARTITIONS"
• In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: 2.4, 2.6, i686/athlon and LDT's"

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:55:53 -0500, Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org> wrote:
> Using the LDT isn't inherently slower, since the cpu caches the segment
> descriptor regardless of if it came from the GDT or LDT.

Not using LDT's on 2.4 kernel other than RHEL3's means to have a
different ABI. This is the /lib/libpthread.so.0 RH is shipping which
simply cannot be used in some/many situations since there is no
"thread register". This means the programmer is not able to select
size and/or location of the stacks. Interfaces like
pthread_attr_setstack() simply won't work at all.

So, do't confuse people with "does anyone have comparison information
w/threads using
LDT's and without (performance, protection, etc)?". That's comparing
apples and oranges.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Yoichi Yuasa: "[PATCH 2.6.10] mtd: added NEC uPD29F064115 support"
• Previous message: Michael S. Tsirkin: "Re: [2.6 patch] add missing dependencies on MTD_PARTITIONS"
• In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: 2.4, 2.6, i686/athlon and LDT's"